Meilinda Sari Yayusman, Anisa Pratita Kirana Mantovani


This paper aims to examine the extent to which ASEAN has attempted to securitize women’s rights at the regional and state level. Securitization theory formulated by the Copenhagen School expounds a set of securitization process by which a certain issue can be categorized as a security issue that should be concerned. In securitization process, an issue should follow three stages: a) non-politicized; b) politicized; c) securitized. Speech act and the acceptance of audience are also paramount in the process. Throughout these steps, the extent to which ASEAN has put endeavor to securitize women’s rights can be determined. At the regional level, attempts through declarations and commitments among member states can be analyzed to indicate ASEAN’s concrete endeavor to take into account women’s rights as an issue that should be securitized. In the meantime, at the state level, Myanmar, a newly democratic country in Southeast Asia, will be analyzed. Women’s rights in Myanmar are of grave concern and as a consequence, securitizing women issues especially the rights of women is of great importance. The limited role of ASEAN has nonetheless given consequences to the action given to a state. Myanmar has becomea concrete example to show that ASEAN merely contributes an influence or encouragement to its member states to promote women’s rights. Securitizing women’s rights at the state levelis arguably difficult due to the principle of non-interference that ASEAN has.

Keywords: securitization theory, ASEAN, Myanmar, women’s rights


Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melihat sejauh mana ASEAN telah berusaha melakukan sekuritisasi terhadap hak-hak wanita di tingkat regional dan negara. Teori sekuritisasi yang dirumuskan oleh Copenhagen School menjelaskan secara terperinci tentang proses sekuritisasi di mana sebuah isu tertentu dapat dikategorikan sebagai isu keamanan yang perlu diperhatikan. Dalam proses sekuritisasi, sebuah isu perlu melalui tiga tahapan, yakni a) tidak dipolitisasi; b) dipolitisasi; c) sekuritisasi. Pidato dan penerimaan dari para pendengar isu juga merupakan hal penting dalam proses sekuritisasi. Melalui langkah-langkah ini, sejauh mana ASEAN telah berusaha untuk melakukan sekuritisasi terhadap isu hak-hak wanita dapat ditentukan. Di tingkat regional, upaya-upaya melalui deklarasi dan komitmen antarnegara anggota dapat dianalisis untuk melihat usaha nyata ASEAN dalam memperjuangkan hak-hak wanita sebagai isu yang perlu disekuritisasi. Di samping itu, di tingkat negara, Myanmar sebagai negara demokrasi baru di Asia Tenggara, akan dianalisis. Hak-hak wanita di Myanmar mendapat perhatian utama, sehingga sekuritisasi terhadap isu-isu hak-hak wanita merupakan hal yang penting. Namun, peran terbatas ASEAN memberikan konsekuensi dalam upaya sekuritisasi di tingkat negara. Myanmar merupakan contoh nyata untuk memperlihatkan bahwa upaya ASEAN dalam sekuritisasi hak-hak wanita hanya sebatas memberikan pengaruh atau dukungan. Melakukan sekuritisasi terhadap hak-hak wanita di tingkat negara dapat dikatakan sulit karena prinsip non-intervensi yang dimiliki ASEAN.


Kata kunciteori sekuritisasi, ASEAN, Myanmar, hak-hak wanita



Full Text:



Acharya, A. (1998). Collective Identity and Conflict Management in Southeast Asia. In Adler, E. & Barnett, M. (Eds), Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AGIPP. (2015, December). Women, Peace and Security Policymaking in Myanmar Context Analysis and Recommendations.

Alagappa, M. (1995). Regionalism and Security: A Conceptual Investigation. In Mack, A. & Ravenhill, J. (Eds.), Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia- Pacific Region. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Alliance for Gender Inclusion. (2015). Women, Peace and Security Policymaking in Myanmar.

ASEAN. (2012). ASEAN Committee on Women (ACW) Work Plan (2011-2015).

ASEAN. (2012). Declaration on the Advancement of Women in the ASEAN Region Bangkok, Thailand, 5 July 1988.

ASEAN. (2012). Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women in the ASEAN Region.

ASEAN. (2015, November). ASEAN Regional Plan of Action on the Elimination of Violence against Women (ASEAN RPA on EVAW).

Buzan, B. et. al., (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publisher.

Ciocari, J. (2012). Institutionalizing Human Rights in Southeast Asia. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(3).695-725.

De Vido, S. (2017). Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in Europe and Asia. In Nakanishi Y. (Ed.) Contemporary Issues in Human Rights Law Europe and Asia. Tokyo: Springer Open.

Franceschet S. (2011) Conceptualizing the Impact of Gender Quotas. InFranceschet, S, Krook, M, Piscopo, J. (Ed.) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gender Equality Network. (2017). Gender and Politics in Myanmar: Women and Men Candidates.

Gender Equality Network and Global Justice Center. (2016, July). The CEDAW Committee on Women’s Rights Challenges in Myanmar, Briefing Paper.

Harriden, J. (2012). The Authority of Influence: Women and Power in Burmese History. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

Helen, J. (2006). Security and Sustainable Development in Myanmar. New York: Routledge.

Hsien Li, T. (2011). The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jones D. M. & Michael L.R.S. (2002). ASEAN‟s Imitation Community. Foreign Policy Research Institute, 46 (1), 93-109.

LSE Centre for Women, Peace, and Security. (2016). ASEAN Committee on Women.

Mc Gregor, F. (2015, November). Myanmar Women’s fight against verbal taboo symbolizes wider rights battle. The Guardian.

Minoletti, P. (2014, June). Women’s Participation in the Subnational Governance of Myanmar. The Asia Foundation Discussion Paper, 3.

Nair, T. (2015). Women, Peace, and Security in ASEAN: Need for Distinct Action Plan. RSIS Commentary 278, 2.

Nyman, J. (2013). Securitization Theory. InShepherd. L. J. (Ed.) Critical Approaches to Security: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Saning, Y. (2014, January). Within the Political Structure, Women Are Treated as Decorative. The Irrawaddy.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taureck, R. (2006). Securitization theory and securitization studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9 (1), 53-61.

Turnell, S. (2011). Myanmar in 2010: Doors Open, Doors Close. Asian Survey (51) 1,148-154.

The Asia Foundation. (2014). Burma: An assessment and mapping of the work of women’s organizations in Burma. New York: OSF.

The Asia Foundation. (2014). Myanmar 2014: Civic Knowledge and Values in a Changing Society. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation.

Transnational Institute. (2015, December). The 2015 General Elections in Myanmar: What Now for Ethnic Politics?.

UN WOMEN. (2016). Gender Equality and Women’s Rights in Myanmar: A Situation Analysis. .

Yasinta, V. (2018, February). Sebelum Meninggal TKI di Malaysia Tidur di Luar Bersama Anjing. Kompas.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Kajian Wilayah
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


  • There are currently no refbacks.