Bureaucratic Reforms in Four Southeast Asia Countries

Prijono Tjiptoherijanto

Abstract

Tata pemerintahan yang baik merupakan masalah penting selama dua dekade terakhir. Good governance telah menjadi paradigma baru menggantikan paradigma lama dalam administrasi publik yang dikembangkan oleh Max Weber. Model konvensional seperti administrasi umum semua tentang pemerintah telah ditinggalkan dan diganti dengan yang baru, yang melibatkan kerjasama dari tiga unsur: pemerintah, masyarakat sipil, dan sektor usaha. Tata pemerintahan yang baik terjadi tidak hanya ketika politisi yang jujur dan akuntabel, tetapi juga ketika pegawai negeri sipil yang efisien dan produktif. Sejak awal, kualitas pemerintahan telah sebagian besar tergantung pada kualitas orang yang menjalankannya. Sayangnya, reputasi pejabat publik berbicara untuk dirinya sendiri di hampir negara-negara berkembang dengan tidak terkecuali di negara-negara Asia Tenggara. Ada persepsi umum bahwa birokrasi di negara-negara yang sebagian besar masih tidak efisien dan korup. Tulisan yang mengambil kasus di empat negara Asia Tenggara ini akan mengungkapkan situasi yang sebenarnya dari kualitas dan perilaku pegawai negeri sipil di negara-negara tersebut.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amendchai, Kongchan. 2000. “Factor Affecting the Career Advancement and Barrier of Women Administrator”, Chulalongkorn Review, 13 (49), pp.77 -92.

Asian Development Bank. 2005.”ADB Country Governance Assessment: Philippines”, Manila, Philippines, 2005.

Bidhya, Boworn Wathana. 2004. ”Thaksin Model of Government Reform : Prime Ministerialisation Through ‘A Country is my Company ‘Approach”, Asian Journal of Political Science 12 (1), pp. 135-153.

G de Leon, Corazon Alma. 1999. ” Innovations and Best Practices in the Philippine Civil Service Commission”, paper presented during the World Conference on Governance, 2 June 1999, EDSA Shangri-la Plaza Hotel, Manila, Philippines.

Hunter, Jeff and Anwar Shah. 1998.”Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1894, Washington D.C, USA, 1998.

Kauffman, Daniel. 2003.”Governance Redux : The Empirical Challenge“, World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper, also available at: http://www. Worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/gouredux.html.

Kong, D. 2006. ”Reinventing South Korea’s Bureaucracy toward Open and Accountable Governance”, Paper presented at the Asian Public Reform Forum, Nanning, China.

Likit, Dhiravegin. 1985. Thai Politics: Selected Aspects of Development and Change,: Bangkok: Tri-Science Publishing House.

Painter, Martin. 2005. ”Thaksin : A Thaksinocracy or Managerialization? Reforming the Thai Bureaucracy”, City University of Hongkong, Working Paper Series, No. 76, May 2005.

Pasuk Phong Paicit and Sungsidh Piriyangsaran. 1996. Corruption and Democracy in Thailand., Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Sasipat Yodpet and Surangrat Attasartsri. ? ? ? ? ? 1981. ”Problem and Desires of Female Civil Servant“ (in Thai). Unpublished paper for the Task Force of Long-Range Women’s Development, Bangkok, Thailand.

Sing, Kavaljit. 2005. Questioning Globalization, , Pulau Pinang: Citizen International,

Sto Thomas, Paticia A and Mangahas, Joel V. 2002. ”Public Administration and Governance : How do They Affect Government Efficiency and Effectiveness?” Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Administration Plus Governance, 21-23 October 2002, Manila Hotel, Philippines.

Supaluk Liamvarongkoon. 2002. ”Effect of Gender Role on Career Advancement in Thai Civil Service”, A Dissertation submitted to the School of Applied Statistics, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok, Thailand.

United Nations. 2005. ”World Public Sector report 2005: Unlocking the Human Potential for Public Sector Performance”, New York, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN.

United Nation Development Program. 2003. ”Public Administration Practice Note”, New York: Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP.

World Bank. 1993. ”The East Asia Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy”, Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.

World Bank. 2001. ”Indonesia: The Imperative for Reform”, Report 23093-IND, World Bank, Jakarta.

World Bank. 2006. ”Country Assistance Strategy Progress Report for Republic of Indonesia”, Washington D.C. World Bank, USA.

Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Kajian Wilayah
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.